When I was tuning aurally, I never liked this particular sequence because it requires a guess about the F A third that is not necessarily integrated into the overall tuning. Check out the Baldessin/Sanderson double octave sequence that uses a series of contiguous thirds to set the bearings. I found (and still find whenever I do tune aurally) that this method gives the best and most consistent result ad makes natural compensations for differences in stretch that are required by different pianos. You will find, for example on a spinet, that in order to get a two octave series of contiguous thirds to beat progressively at a 4:5 ratio within the double octave that you set up, that the F3-A3 third will come in at a slower beat than it would on a larger piano. Once you have the series of contiguous thirds set up over the entire two octave span (A2, C#3, F3, A3, C#4, F4, A4) you have a solid set of bearing points that allow you to fit in the remaining notes more easily with many checks available. David Love davidlovepianos@earthlink.net > Thanks for the reply Phil.Hope Jim C. won't mind this.Here is the > progression: > 1) A49 to fork > 2) A37 from A49 > 3)F33 from A37 7bps > 4)F45 from F33 > 5)C#41 from F45 ... balancing pivotal thirds > 6)D42 fromA37 (4th) > 7)A#38 fromF45 (5th) > 8)F#46 from C#41 (4th) > 9)C40 from F45 (4th) > 10)E44 from A49 (4th) this is where I encounter my problem? > 11)C#41 fromG#48 (5th) > 12)B39 from F#46 (5th) > 13)D#43 from A#38 (4th) > 14)G47 fromD42 > > Hope this helps to clarify my original post > > > Jim Morrison > More questions than answers > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC