This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
I'm not really looking for the partials of the notes, I am trying to =
determine the best octave for an individual piano. If there is a lot of =
inharmonicity, sometimes a 4:2 is too wide for the 2:1. If you know all =
of the partial values in cents, how would you determine octave widths =
that fit the best.=20
A2
1st partial
=20
=20
2nd partial
-6.72
=20
3nd partial
-4.52
=20
4nd partial
-2.57
=20
5nd partial
0.48
=20
6nd partial
3.27
=20
7nd partial
6.92
=20
8nd partial
5.85
=20
=20
A3
1st partial
-1.06
=20
2nd partial
-1.84
=20
3nd partial
0.33
=20
4nd partial
3.1
=20
5nd partial
6.88
=20
6nd partial
11.36
=20
7nd partial
15.23
=20
8nd partial
20.3
=20
A4
1st partial
0
=20
2nd partial
1.27
=20
3nd partial
4.28
=20
4nd partial
9.99
=20
5nd partial
15.99
=20
6nd partial
23.27
=20
7nd partial
31.84
=20
8nd partial
41.46
=20
This is A2 , A3 and A4 from a Wurlitzer spinet, we know all of the =
information of the partials and can see how much stretch there needs to =
be. Is there a way to determine the beat rate of any type of octave =
from these numbers. Is a 6:3 too wide in the tenor, probably, can these =
numbers prove that. If I tuned a 4:2 octave, what would the beat rate =
be of the 2:1. It is not the octave type that I need but determining =
which one fits the best to give me fairly clean octaves. I believe the =
RCT has some of those capabilities to combine beats and cents =
measurements into its calculations, but what is the best way to take =
cents measurements and determine beat values?
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/dd/3c/d9/a6/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC