Correct Hammer Surfacing, (Yeah, I changed it!)

antares antares@euronet.nl
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:19:22 +0200


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment

On 23-aug-04, at 19:14, Joe Garrett wrote:

> =A0What my mentor called it was: Hammer Shaping! I've since convinced=20=

> him to call it Surfacing, Resurfacing or Filing.
>  I find this to be a constant irritant. The oldetimers called it=20
> "shaping" and everyone else just follows along like sheep! Sheesh! The=20=

> term invokes an incorrect approach to the process, thus making one=20
> have the propensity to do the process incorrectly. It's a mind image=20=

> thingee.
> Once one grasps the concepts of what actually SHAPES A HAMMER or put=20=

> in proper context what actually DETERMINES the shape of a hammer, then=20=

> it will all be clearer and cause one to approach the process=20
> correctly.
> THE SHAPE is dictated by several factors: 1. the shape of the=20
> moulding. 2. the shape of the under felt. 3. the shape that the hammer=20=

> felt is skived to, pre pressing. The secondary factorsw are: 1: the=20
> shape of the caul that the hammers are pressed into. 2. the amount of=20=

> pressure during pressing 3. how long the hammers are left in the caul.=20=

> All of these things dictate the SHAPE of a hammer!
> In actuality, we really are "peeling", (a=A0LAYER off of),=A0the =
hammer.=20
> If we follow the "natural" curvature, (ie shape), we will have taken=20=

> off continuous layer of felt. This leaves a continuous layer on the=20
> top surface of the hammer. IMO, this lends to better/easier voicing=20
> possibilities. Thus making our work easier.<G> If there is not a=20
> continuous layer of felt on the top surface of the hammer, OR if the=20=

> hammers have been worn/surfaced too many times we are contending with=20=

> short layers that are holding very little pressure in an uneven=20
> manner. Sound familiar?
> On that, I'll let y'all ponder, for a while. For those who choose to=20=

> continue to use the archaic/incorrect term, so be it. IMO, ya just=20
> don't get it!<G> Most on this list espouses making changes for the=20
> better, in our industry. This is one of those changes, that is way=20
> overdue. Think about it.
> Best Regards,
> Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
> Captain, Tool Police
> Squares R I
>



antares

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2681 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/7b/c7/f1/43/attachment.bin

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC