Thanks, Robin for saving me some time. I was too busy yesterday to get to it (it's that time of year) and this weekend isn't looking so good either (family obligations). If all works out, I will have time on Monday, to get back to this project. Barbara Richmond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Hufford" <hufford1@airmail.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Rebushing centers/mystery center pinning > Hello Richard, Don and Barbara, > A few more comments interposed. > First, I did try today the use of alcohol as a wetting agent; it was > useless as it served only to accelerate the reaction and immediately > harden the mixture as Don Rose predicted it would. Also, while applying > it to a piece of bushing cloth as Barbara considered doing it was obvious > that there really was no need for a wetting agent as it disappeared almost > instantaneously upon being dripped onto the cloth. There was no > discernible puddling or lag time. Again, this was a Don predicated. Two > for two. It may be however, that the penetrabilty of this mixture may be > different in a bushed flange whether the pressure in the bushing may have > to be taken into account. The obvious effect of this stuff was to stiffen > and harden slightly the cloth as I intended. > Richard Brekne wrote: > >> Hi again Robin, a couple comments below >> >> Robin Hufford wrote: >> >>> Hello Richard, >>> ..... However, simply because the claim is made that the bushing is >>> hard doesn't mean, in my experience, they will be, perhaps yes, perhaps >>> no, perhaps sometimes and one probably will not know when until >>> perplexing difficulties arise. One can take the hammershank and >>> flange in hand and hold the flange tightly while trying to wiggle the >>> shank in a way so that the pin can be made to move back and forth in the >>> bushing and watch this motion. A soft bushing will show more motion >>> of the pin in the bushing and that is a serious problem as it has a >>> really detrimental effect on the sound. >> >> >> Herein lies at least one tentative test for Barbaras flanges and it would >> be nice to hear what she observes in this regard. Up to this point >> I've been taking for granted that the bushings in question were as >> previously described. >> >> >>> Sometimes, as I Barbara and I both have experienced, repining is only a >>> temporary improvement; in the face of such a frustrating experience I >>> tried the method I described. It appears, as I said, at least for the >>> moment to have both worked at the time of use in stabilizing the >>> friction and wobble and led to no discernible subsequent pining problem. >>> But, again, its purpose was to deal with an overly soft bushing. >> >> >> I have to admit I've never tried the kind of solution you describe above, >> being hesitant to apply any chemicals at all to either hammers or >> bushings. Too many unsatisfactory experiences for my part. > > In general, I thoroughly agree: A clean pin, of the right alloy, with > a proper woven felt cloth, properly densified, I think, can be shown to > have worked for generations reliably and can continue to be expected to do > so. Why fiddle around with anything else? A lesson, in my opinion, > these various companies should take to heart. But they don't and they > put out, generally for frivolous reasons, the kinds of products of which > we are taking note of here. But, in this case, here was a problem in need > of a solution, which, in the case of my use of the technique, appears to > have worked. >> What I have found works very well is to work a good deal of teflon powder >> into the bushing and burnish very agressively followed by a rather tight >> pinning. Generally if I do have a problem afterwareds it goes in the >> opposite direction and I need to loosen things up a bit. Perhaps I might >> give your suggestion a try tho on some spares I have. Never thought of >> using CA in this context before. >> >> >>> If I were Barbara in this situation I would find two or three really >>> weak sounding notes from the middle and low treble and change nothing >>> else but the density of their bushings with the mixture, or take the >>> time to use water with alcohol, and judge from the results. I think is >>> absurd even to have to do this lesser task by necessity but even more so >>> when it is necessary to take the time to rebush parts for which one >>> has already paid good money to have acceptable bushings come along with >>> the rest of the order. I'll have to climb down off my soapbox here >>> before I get myself really worked up! >>> Regards, Robin Hufford >> >> >> Agreed, should be an un-needed operation for high quality parts. But >> then, assuming these are the new NY Steinway parts... we (I at least) >> dont know really what these are like from the get go. That said... the >> whole concept of bushings with such low friction does not appeal to me in >> the first place. > > It doesn't to me either: I am not sure it is even a valid technical idea > and it seems this idea may only be a stop-gap attempt to deal with the > problems of geometry, excessive mass and friction which one sees in the > present production. >> RicB >> _______________________________________________ >> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >> > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC