This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Barry:
As someone said, if you look in the archives you will find a range of =
opinions on correspondence courses and in particular about Randy =
Potter's course.=20
I started Randy's course about 1 year ago (you can get an extension =
which gives you 2 full years to complete it) after being laid off as an =
Electrical Engineer after 20 1/2 years. Initially I received pretty good =
feedback from Randy, and when I'd call Randy on the phone, he spend a =
bunch of time with me and patiently answer my questions (that aspect =
never changed).
However, in my view, one of the key parts of the course are his =
evaluations of your tuning tapes. This just did not take place in a =
timely manner! I believe my first tape took about 2 months to be =
returned, and I am still waiting for my 2nd tuning tape from last JULY =
(2003). I've sent multiple messages asking about it, and placed a note =
in my exams, which I've sent to him since then, and haven't heard a =
thing. I know he has a strict e-mail format and I've goof that up a few =
times, but not enough times to not hear back on this issue and a few =
other e-mail questions. My last correspondence with him was that getting =
him in the phone is a better method for communication. Well without a =
job I really couldn't afford to do that and being the stubborn Dutchman, =
just sort decided that if e-mail isn't working then forget it. (e-mail =
is mentioned in the course and on his web site as the preferred method =
of communication)
I've also gotten pretty busy with a new job recently, and I have let my =
studies slip so I do not blame Randy totally for this, but to be quite =
frank, money was very very tight last year without a job for 15 months. =
It was a stretch to come up with the first $900.00 (3 payments of =
$300.00) and I was very discouraged that his evaluation of my 2nd tape =
just never got back to me. That part of the course is so critical for =
those of us without a tuner/technician to work with and provide the =
needed feedback.
One other comment is that the video tape quality is very poor. I =
borrowed some of his course videos from a fellow technician that were =
made in the 80's (less material then the newer ones) and the quality of =
the video and sound was much much better. As an example, when Jim =
Coleman is trying teach how to listen for beats, the audio quality was =
so poor that it was hard to know what was sound track tape variations =
and what was the actual beating you were suppose to hear. The older tape =
did not have this problem - I thought it was me until I listen to them!
Finally, because money was so tight, I decided to purchase the course in =
shipments. The problem with this is that the video material is spread =
out and critical information is not given to you to go with the written =
material until shipments 4 & 5. So you end up having to skip or do =
certain exams with just the written material. I would not recommend =
buying it in shipments if you decide to take this course - get it all at =
once so you can have everything you need right up front.
Now I've said much in the way of negative comments - there are certainly =
many many positive things about the course and it is worth considering. =
I believe I've learn much from it and hope to continue this year. Time =
is making that tough right now.
I hope I haven't dampened your interest in learning to tune and repair =
pianos. I've found it to be a real sense of pride and joy taking an =
instrument that sounds very poor, and when I'm done in 2-3 hours (I'm =
slow), it sounds like a piano again (in my humble opinion). I'm glad I =
started down this path and hope to continue.
Joe - I live near Dave and Willis Snyder and have been a guest at the =
local PTG meetings which they attend and can imagine the face-to-face =
classes you took with Dave and others were very rewarding! They are =
great guys! (See I can say something positive. : )
Jeff Schlaybach
- Robesonia, PA
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Joe And Penny Goss=20
To: Pianotech ; Randy Potter ; Randy Potter=20
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Correspondence tuning courses
Hi Barry,
I have not taken the course but did attend this years seminar at =
Minnisota. 10 days of top of the line class and hands on work. There =
were 4 teachers for 26 students, and two groups. Advanced ( 8 working on =
passing the tuning test for PTG ) and the 18 working on basic tuning and =
repair skills. Randy took the 8 of us while Tom Cobble, Ward Guthrey and =
David Snyder worked the 18.
Classes went from 8 AM to 10 PM at night with about 45 minutes for =
lunch and dinner
If you have the TIME and FUNDS a school would be my choice. But Randy =
offers another way to gather the knowledge and skills needed to become =
proficent in piano work at your pace of learning.
Attending the workshop allowed me to get a very good view of the =
overall scope of the course. And as a teacher of 39 years can =
confidently say that this is a top of the line
correspondence course.
One insight, due to all the spam out there in the email world, one =
must folow Randy's instructions for communication very closely. Any =
deviation from the rules will result in your messages not getting =
through to him.
.
Joe Goss
imatunr@srvinet.com
www.mothergoosetools.com
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Barry=20
To: Piano List=20
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:43 PM
Subject: Correspondence tuning courses
Hi everyone..
I would like to get some reaction from you regarding the =
correspondence courses available.. eg: Randy Potter and the American =
School of Tuning etc.
There are no "hands on" courses available in Australia anymore =
except occasional apprenticeships.
Has anyone successfully passed one of these correspondence courses =
and would you recommend them?
Thanks
Barry
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ae/c2/45/e8/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC