I agree - a low cost 3% accuracy instrument should be fine for tracking
changes in humidity in a customer's home over time. For use in a
customer's home, I would argue that it is the repeatability that is more
important than the actual accuracy of the instrument. Sensor linearity is
also important but no matter what the sensor make-up, all sensors start to
become non-linear at the extreme ends of the scale (as has already been
discussed).
Practically speaking, you want to pay for an instrument with reasonable
accuracy (3-5% full-scale) and even better repeatability (0.5 to 1%
full-scale). An instrument at this level can be purchased in the $50 to
$100 range. I don't see a need to purchase anything more expensive for use
in tracking humidity levels in a customer's home.
Corte Swearingen
Chicago
Richard Brekne
<Richard.Brekne@gr To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>
ieg.uib.no> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Zero percent humidity
pianotech-bounces@
ptg.org
01/09/2004 05:15
AM
Please respond to
Pianotech
Hi humidity freaks :)
Just curious... shop use for building is one thing, but in advising
customers at home, DC use, and other less critical applications... I
generally just have one of those 5 dollar digi-hygrometers in my bag.
Supposed to be good for +/- 3 % RH in the range of 23% to 90 %. I
generally point out that anything under 30 % is just plain too dry, and
anything over 70% is just plain to wet.
Is there any reason for needing more accuracy in these kinds of
instances that I should know about ?
Cheers
RicB
Farrell wrote:
>
> What kind of an instrument are you using to measure RH @ less than 20%?
>
> Terry Farrell
>
_______________________________________________
pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC