---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 6/3/04 10:22:37 AM, roger.j@sasktel.net writes: > Do you have sufficient after touch?=A0 If the hammers > have been filed, and the back rail has not been corrected, (46mm blow if m= y > memory is correct).=A0 This can be the cause of the problem.=A0 Dip should= be=20 > 10mm. > =A0 Key level through the centre section will also give the same problem. > Are the length of the loops the same as the old loops?=A0 This can > significantly alter the spring tension. >=20 Thanks to all for your great suggestions. Roger, you've given me a few=20 things to check. There IS enough after touch, but I wonder if the loops ar= e the=20 same size. They were certainly made of a different material, much thicker=20= in=20 diameter than the old loop. I did move the hammer rail forward to the spec= s=20 in the little blue book by Potter, but I don't recall the distance. I also= =20 levelled the keys and set the dip all to the specs listed in that book. =20 I just have the gut feeling that this is caused by something that I changed,= =20 and not just wear and tear. After all, this problem appeared en masse from= =20 the moment I put it all back together. PTG (PianoTunaGuy) ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/dc/2d/0f/7c/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC