Thank you for explaining that to me, Arthur. I do not
enjoy laboring under misconceptions.
I agree that a properly regulated, classic
reproducer is more exciting than the computer thingees
which I've heard. But the overwhelming convenience of
a simple CD over boxes and boxes of rolls makes the
modern version more useful to the average consumer.
Thump
--- MarinoPiano@aol.com wrote:
> RE: Lost motion. I remember that the plungers on
> the PianoDisc were spring
> loaded so that lost motion was taken care of. You
> can also run a program from
> the control box that adjusts the intensity of each
> note indivudally to make a
> nice even soft. I too have worked on may
> reproducers from the past. Playing
> discs that have been transfered from reproducing
> rolls is almost as exciting..
> Keyword is ALMOST.
>
> There is really nothing like the sound of a well
> rebuilt Steinway DuoArt
> or Mason Ampico in my book. But I think I'm a bit
> prejudice.
> And I might add, happily so.
>
> Arthur Marino
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC