Lacquer fight! Lacquer fight!

Topperpiano@aol.com Topperpiano@aol.com
Fri, 14 May 2004 09:53:05 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
The ability of the hammer fibers to move longitudinally is in my mind the 
essence of good powerful piano tone.  In my work I HAVE to lacquer because on a 
softer hammer with a limited amount of springyness there is no other way to 
increase volume.  I lacquer frequently but wouldn't if the hammer had the 
movement to push the string into motion and get off quickly rather that to push the 
string out of its place of rest just at the striking point giving me what I 
call a Wheeeoo sound that is short on the fundamental and rapidly goes into a 
deviant harmonic splash.  I don't know any other way to express it.  The older 
Steinway hammers were softer and almost silky to the touch.  I've always thought 
that it was more lanolin that remained in the hammer fiber, giving it a 
resilience.  When you file those older hammers you have all sorts of trash and 
black spots that are trapped inside.  I have always assumed that they didn't 
"clean the wool very well" leaving more lubricant inside which also actually made 
it sound better.  This is just my thought on this. I also feel that the lacquer 
sound has been accepted by most pianists in this country. I have over the 
years used about every other hammer in rebuilding as well as S&S to try to get 
what I heard years ago in the Steinway hammers that were still around from the 
pre 20's. Sometimes I have gotten close.  I try to needle, iron and file to get 
the best out of an intrinsically soft hammer but bright is what sells. 
Topperpiano (TP)

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f1/4b/81/23/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC