---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
=20
Conrad
Thanks for the unusually political post. It's always more personal when=20
you & others especially Military folks are on the recieving end of the kin=
ds=20
of actions & words being discussed here in regards to J.F.Kerry.
I've been hearing that his picture is in the Vietnamese Museum as a hero=
=20
so I guess they like him for being a patriot there as well as some do here.
Thanks for your service to this country.
Dale
At 17:38 10/28/2004, you wrote:
>If you know something about John Kerry being a traitor you should report
>him--and soon. He may be elected President. It is a crime, afterall,
>and I'm sure Mr. Ashcroft would want to look at your hard evidence.
>Don't hold back, Carl, do your duty. Withholding evidence of capital
>crime might just be a crime itself--especially one as serious as
>treason.
>
>David Love
>davidlovepianos@comcast.net
David,
Speaking out politically is WAY different than my norm, and the way this=20
eternal campaign has polarised the country will probably lose me some=20
friends on this list, but I feel I must - please indulge me this last time.
I'm not Carl, but _I_ do not need to check websites to determine Kerry's =20
culpability, but I may dig into my old seabag, pull out my Bluejacket's =20
Manual and rely on my first hand experience of the effects of Kerry.
If you really still trust websites at this point, perhaps you should=20
re-read Kerry's own words during his Senate testimony, and also afterwards,=
=20
where he admits participating in the same atrocities which he said were=20
happening. Or... did he say he was just reporting what other vets had told=
=20
him. Oh... that's right... he said both. Which version was purgery?
Since I was in the area at the time (Tonkin Gulf) and in the same=20
organization (US Navy '67-'73) and trying to live under the same rules=20
(UCMJ) [Uniform Code of Military Justice], let me try to help you with you=20
some of the military rules with regard to his traitorous activities.
Whilst Kerry was still a commissioned officer and ostensibly bound by the=20
UCMJ, he visited with members of the Viet Cong in Paris. How a Lieutenant=20
(Paygrade O-2or3 -- i.e. next to the bottom of officer ranks since Ensign=20
was routinely skipped) thought he could effect peace, who knows? However,=20
there is a term called "consorting with the enemy". In a war, the idea=20
generally is that, if you meet an enemy, you do all you can to kill him.=20
It's brutal, but that IS what war IS. {Note to Bill Clinton - there's that=20
word again} As an officer, it is your sworn DUTY to do that and lead =20
others to do the same. You don't generally sit down to croissants and =20
caviar with the enemy unless you are a general, admiral or head of =20
state. Money talks, I suppose, as Saddam knew in his dealings with the=20
same multiple UN members which Kerry thinks he'd get as allies.
I recall several times in my military career having these things drilled=20
into my head, so I don't need to consult a website to tell me that, if I as=
=20
a 2nd class petty officer (only E-5 or middle of non-commissioned officers,=
=20
having turned down E-6 opportunities to return to civilian life) had done=20
the same thing, I would still be in Fort Leavenworth for it, if not in an=20
unmarked grave.
How good was he for the morale of troops/sailors in those years? He=20
certainly didn't make any points with me or my shipmates. In the spring of=
=20
1970, when my ship got back from it's tour of duty in the war zone - with=20
_IT'S_ current mission accomplished and signs celebrating that fact - I did=
=20
a lot of traveling around southern and, later, northern California. I went=
=20
to concerts at Dorothy Chandler Pavilion (free or at a discount), =20
hitchhiked, went to movies and church and got invited into strangers homes =20
for home cooked meals, even got some dates after those meals. ALL WHILE IN=
=20
UNIFORM.
In the fall of 1972, when I got back from my second WestPac "cruise",=20
sailors were, by that time, again allowed to grow beards and have (even=20
encouraged to have) civilian clothes onboard and allowed (even encouraged)=20
to go on "liberty" in civvies. WHY? Because, by then, people were=20
shouting the "baby killer' and other phrases which Kerry had made so=20
popular in 1971.
Being IN DANGER while wearing your uniform IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY is NOT good=20
for morale! Having a long hair wig to escape military haircut detection, =20
and getting spat upon for defending your country is NOT good for morale (I =20
did and I was)! _Trust me_, not some New York Times/CBS fabrifacts. It=
=20
took me 20 years before I felt comfortable even joining the VFW. I lay=20
that sputum in my face directly on Kerry's doorstep. His statements were=20
not a little over the top. They were slanderous and self-incriminating, if=
=20
you could believe any of them. They were certainly demoralising, and a=20
comfort to the enemy, whether true or not.
The soldiers/sailors/marines in Iraq do NOT want a POTUS/CIC (President of=20
the US /Commander in Chief) who is against what they are doing in the first=
=20
place. Kerry would have the same benefit to military morale in 2005 as he=20
did in 1971.
Voting to approve military action and then voting against support for the=20
same action does not instill a feeling of comfort among those who depend on=
=20
that support for their lives, either.
My 10=A2.
Conrad Hoffsommer
-Former Machinist's Mate 2nd Class - USN
-Nuclear power plant operator aboard USS Long Beach (CGN-9) 1970-73
Yup, it's personal.
over and out.
=20
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/80/cf/46/fc/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC