---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Matthew,
The easiest piano to tune is a concert grand 9' or more. The hardest, one
of the little wurli spinet monsters where the lid just clear the top of the
sharps.
Good luck finding an easy one. ;-)
Andrew
At 11:13 AM 9/29/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>Thanks for the replies. I am practicing my tuning on a 1913 Hinze
>upright. Is that doing me more harm than good here? I think it is hard
>to hear lots of stuff on that piano, but then again, I am a beginner, so I
>don't know if it's more the piano or more me not having trained ears
>yet. I know lots of families with much newer pianos, should I try to hook
>up with one of them and maybe work it out with them to practice my tuning
>on it?
>
>Matthew
>
>BobDavis88@aol.com wrote:
>Matthew writes:
>When I tune the temperament octave (A3-A4), it needs to be a 4:2 octave,
>correct?
>
>No. Read the many replies which said that it should usually be wider than
>that.
>And one way to test this octave is to play the A two octaves above the
>lower note as the test key, to hear the partials in the octave, am I right?
>
>Not exactly, but read Don Rose's comments on ghosting.
> If the octave you are testing has no beat whatsoever, you have a
> perfect temperament octave, is this true?
>
>No. There is no such thing as a beatless octave. An octave which is not
>beating at one level, such as 4:2, will be beating at all other coincident
>partials, such as 2:1, 6:3, 8:4. The higher the beatless coincident is in
>the chain, the wider the octave. A good compromise octave is usually
>pretty quiet, though,
>
>Matthew,
>
>If you have kept this trail of posts on octave tuning, please go back and
>re-read it, and the links to which you were referred, including the ones
>to the AccuTuner manual Appendices F and H. People are happy to spend time
>helping you, but you've got to do your homework and read the replies. At
>the risk of repetition, I include, directly below, a copy of my post from
>last week on this subject:
>Bob Davis
>-------------
>Matthew's original question was how to tune a 4:2 octave. Several people,
>myself included, sent the tests, aural and visual. Whether that [meaning
>4:2] is appropriate for the temperament octave on a particular piano is a
>second question. Tuning so that "the 10th is just noticeably faster than
>the third" might produce a good width of octave, but it is NOT a 4:2.
>[It's wider]
>
>A clean 4:2 octave IS wide at 2:1, and narrow at 6:3. Most aural tuners
>naturally gravitate towards a temperament octave that is very slightly
>wide of 4:2 ("the 10th is just noticeably faster than the third"), which
>will be substantially wide of 2:1 and a tiny narrow of 6:3. This gives an
>octave that is pretty clean-sounding, and produces fifths which are pretty
>clean and fourths that aren't too trashy. Any octave size can be divided
>into 12 equal half steps. A true 4:2 octave will produce cleaner fourths
>and more movement in the fifths, and on most pianos will be unnecessarily
>narow. However, on some pianos with high inharmonicity, a wide temperament
>octave added to a clean octave below, will produce a double octave that is
>too noisy. It's a balancing act.
>
>
>Do you Yahoo!?
><http://vote.yahoo.com>vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/9c/b9/18/f7/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC