This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Several months ago I bought a Sanderson Accutuner III. I have used this = to tune pianos, but I would like it to help me to become a good aural = tuner. So far, I have worked through several different temperaments by = ear (Defebaugh, Potter, Coleman etc) and checked the accuracy of each = note against those stored in the SAT (after I performed an FAC stretch = measurement on the piano, using the procedure described in the = handbook). I found that some of the notes were very close while others = were too sharp or flat, and I have to improve my accuracy. =20 I used the SAT to check how accurately I could set A49 to a tuning fork = when matching the beat rate against F21. I performed some checks on = unisons to find out how close the tuning of the three strings were after = I tuned them by ear.=20 I also used the SAT to tune the notes within the temperament, and then = listened to the beat rates of the 3rds, 4ths, 5ths and 6ths to hear out = what they should sound like when I eventually set the temperament = correctly by ear. I assume that the beat rates of these intervals when = set by an SAT would be what one would expect. I am still finding the = beats difficult to hear, being rather faint, and not easy to judge if = one interval has a slighty faster or slower beat rate than another.=20 I assume these are good ways to use the SAT for learning to tune = aurally, but are there any other things I could do that would be = helpful?=20 Thank you for your advice. By the way, I have applied to join the Boston = chapter of the PTG, and I hope this will be very beneficial.=20 Robert Finley ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/d8/87/04/fb/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC