This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment That puzzles me. 2:1 is to me a very narrow setting although I have a friend that uses that all the time. I'm suspicious of the IH readings. Many Baldwin spinets and even worse, the consoles, have some really weird readings around C5. That can mess up the calculations higher up. How stretched was say, C7 & C8 on that tuning? =20 dave =20 David M. Porritt dporritt@smu.edu ________________________________ From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Piannaman@aol.com Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 9:34 AM To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Re: Not what I signed up for =20 In a message dated 2/5/05 6:25:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, dporritt@mail.smu.edu writes: Just out of curiosity and as an avid TuneLab Pocket user, what kind of stretch were you using for that Accrosonic tuning? =20 6:3 octaves in the bass and 2:1 in the treble...oops, 4:1 in the treble would been the better option. I thought I had my default settings set correctly....:-( I was a bit rattled by his manner, and didn't pay as much attention to what I was doing as I should have. I don't often use Tunelab to tune the whole piano. It's usually just to get pitch or occasionally to help me set the temperament. =20 Maybe I should go back and retune it...only if the guy doesn't stand over my shoulder, though....(-: =20 Everyone, thanks for the input and comiseration. =20 Humbly, =20 Dave S.=20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e5/bf/f8/15/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC