Which brings up my next question: To increase
stiffness, why not "beef up" the ribs, instead of
shortening them with cutoffs and such ? That way you
would preserve soundboard area, and still avoid
"bridge collapse". This Packard I'm working on has NO
cutoffs, but VERY "beefy" ribs----- and still sounds
GREAT after 80 years, with loads of actual water
damage to the board, and about a dozen cracks.
Thump
--- Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >When the pulse from the string hits the bridge and
> >therefore the soundboard, it travels in the board
> >until it gets to a place on the board that no
> longer.................
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> It is intended to reduce soundboard area behind the
> treble bridge and
> shorten the ribs. With both a fish and a bass
> cutoff, the ribs through the
> killer octave are shortened too, and a more uniform
> progression of rib
> length (and stiffness control) is obtained from
> tenor to treble.
>
> Ron N
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info:
> https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC