This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
List,
About a month ago, I started a thread about soundboards and whether =
old wood sounded better than new wood. That discussion went into =
overtime and I do NOT wish to start it over. Since that thread was =
posted, I have torn apart a few landfill quality pianos for experimental =
purposes. I disected the soundboards to see what makes them tick, so to =
speak. Here's an observation for your information. =20
I tore apart 2 Lester spinets. The one made in '46 had a solid spruce =
soundboard and several cracks. The one made in '57 appeared to be a =
nice flawless spruce board with no cracks. I very carefully removed it. =
It turned out to be a plywood soundboard covered with a beautiful =
grainy veneer on both sides. Perhaps that's why it had no cracks? =
Perhaps that's also why it had the tone it did. =20
Today, my son is gutting an old Kimball spinet with a mahogany =
soundboard. It too turns out to be veneer over plywood. Tomorrow we'll =
get into a Story and Clark console with the famous "Storytone" =
soundboard, made of mahogany. I may prove to be wrong but I have a =
suspicion that I'm going to find mahogany veneer over plywood. =20
My point is this: There can be some hidden factors affecting the tone =
of a piano that both the public and we as piano technicians may not be =
aware of...such as a misleading soundboard. =20
In the future if I ever get into voicing an older vertical piano again =
and the hammers won't give me the tone I thought it would...maybe the =
hammers aren't the problem. =20
regards
Ron Shiflet =20
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/65/4c/f5/91/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC