Steinway d-rolled bridge saga- report

[Michael Gamble]

Yes, David - please keep us posted. I have been waiting to hear the latest 
and how S&S dealt with the rolled bridge problem. It's like taking delivery 
of a new Rolls Royce - then finding there's a Wankel engine in it! This is a 
classic example of getting the true answer from S&S. Finding the answer is 
one thing though. How S&S properly deal with it is another - and this latter 
is what I would like to find out!
Michael G.(UK)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Steinway d-rolled bridge saga- report


> Indeed, please do. Little doubt a number of us would be interested to see 
> a response. I would certainly be among them.
>
> This passage, in particular, struck me:
>
> "Theoretically, there should be positive front
> and back bearing. However, pianos seldom conform to
> the theoretically correct."
>
> Interesting....
>
> Terry Farrell
>
>
>> David:
>>
>> I didn't see any responses to this email.  Do keep us posted on how this
>> comes out.
>>
>> David M. Porritt
>> dporritt@smu.edu
>
>
>