This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment David, did you mean sit butt or seat string?=20 Again, I don't think Ron is trying to be a jokester.=20 Here, look at me: :-| Or am I just that slow? I think Ron's point is that string seating is likely of little if any = benefit (at least long term) to false beat reduction. If you isolate the = two procedures, you can better evaluate how each procedure affects the = outcome. Perhaps a similar benefit will occur from CA application alone. Terry Farrell ;-) > No, no Joe don't do that...seat, then the CA...;-] >=20 > David I. >=20 >>> Hi all, >>> Today marked the taming of one of the worst false beating pianos, an = >>> Everett console. >>> No unison from C5 to the top had any single string without a real = shudder >>> when the unison was tuned. To liken it to a Calliope would insult = that=20 >>> instrument, >>> With the help of my tipper, string seater, and two passes with CA = the=20 >>> unisons are now clear and strong, >>> I was not supprised to find that after seating the upper treble was=20 >>> flat, but after the CA was applied, a little sharp. This seems to = happen=20 >>> regurally when I do the CA thing on false beats. >=20 >=20 >>Joe, >>Next time, in the interest of education, try the CA without seating=20 >>anything and see what you get. >>Ron N ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/06/05/43/5e/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC