This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Alan Barnard said: "I notice every month in the journal there are many = more "new members" than there are "new RPTs". It seems like, over time, = the numbers ought to be almost the same, discounting only non-tuning = members. I have my theories. There were quite a few who took exams in = Kansas City, but are not now RPT's. Are we undermotivated? = Underprepared?=20 Your thoughts? One other thing: Some regions have pretty good accomodation for people = who want to take exams. Others, it seems, have very limited numbers of = opportunities--few CTEs and TECs, few willing mentors, perhaps, or = people willing to set up and run exams. I don't want to make it "easy" to become an RPT, but if there are = barriers having nothing to do with the talent, knowledge and interest of = Associate members, they need to be removed, methinks." Alan, It has thus, forever. I've been of the same mind in this regard. I wish = there were a way to "motivate" RPTs to get more involved with the = "process". Personally, I mentor as much as is possible. But, I'm just = one RPT, can't do 'em all. This should be a topic at ALL Chapter = Meetings. Hmmm? Perhaps some kind of incentive program for those who = mentor? Regards,=20 Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain, Tool Police Squares R I ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/14/2d/6d/f2/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC