This is a multipart message in MIME format ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment It's only a little joke between Ron and I...me the string seater= and he the non-string seater. David I. Original message From: Farrell To: Pianotech Received: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:17:13 -0400 Subject: Re: climbing mt Everett David, did you mean sit butt or seat string? Again, I don't think Ron is trying to be a jokester. Here, look at me: :-| Or am I just that slow? I think Ron's point is that string seating is likely of little if= any benefit (at least long term) to false beat reduction. If you= isolate the two procedures, you can better evaluate how each= procedure affects the outcome. Perhaps a similar benefit will= occur from CA application alone. Terry Farrell ;-) > No, no Joe don't do that...seat, then the CA...;-] > > David I. > >>> Hi all, >>> Today marked the taming of one of the worst false beating= pianos, an >>> Everett console. >>> No unison from C5 to the top had any single string without a= real shudder >>> when the unison was tuned. To liken it to a Calliope would= insult that >>> instrument, >>> With the help of my tipper, string seater, and two passes= with CA the >>> unisons are now clear and strong, >>> I was not supprised to find that after seating the upper= treble was >>> flat, but after the CA was applied, a little sharp. This= seems to happen >>> regurally when I do the CA thing on false beats. > > >>Joe, >>Next time, in the interest of education, try the CA without= seating >>anything and see what you get. >>Ron N ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e6/a0/f2/2b/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC