Dale... Thank you for a very well written post which I find very much indeed to be in agreement with. Two comments only. You said "My friend,...I don't get it...... why is it that this seems so difficult for you to accept or at least acknowledge? " Thats just it... I HAVE acknowledged... time and time again the fact that Ron N, Ron O, and the whole RC & S gang have clearly demonstrated that they can produce wonderful sounding pianos with beautiful sound characteristics of their own. What do you guys want from me ? Heck you stood there right beside me in Rochester as we both admired the sound of Ron N's instrument from many angles during the concert. What I will NOT accept is the idea that the worlds most successful piano, in fact the most successful product in any industry ever, has by design a soundboard that is inferior. Its just plain... untenable. And quite obviously the vast majority of the industry agrees. Nor will I accept that the RC & S board can be so superior in performance on the one hand and then on the other demonstrate no significant differences in sound characteristics... or that these CAN be made to sound just like the then inferred less desirable performing of these same aforementioned instruments.... but nobody will bother to demonstrate that because " well ... who would want to anyways ?" This is all self contradictory and evasive. Quoting you again... "You have added well to the discussion & I agree with you. It's been a good one." Thanks muchly. You have too, as you always do when it comes down to it. I've enjoyed nearly all of it myself. And I truly wish you are able to find a way of dealing with the technical support issues you originally raised when this round started that you find satisfactory for both yourself and your customers. Merry Christmas Dale Erwin Merry Christmas to you as well Dale. Richard Brekne
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC