Hi Ric. One more thought, if I may. Some older pianos I have heard and worked on have after ring sounding like pure happyness, emphasizing every nuance in the playing, and some others have after ring sound like a mess, asking for being muted, please. Now, apart from carefully choosing the felt quality for the dampers (I could appreciate some original very soft felt arranged in a very clever progressive damping pattern) and their shape over the scale (btw are the dampers of your Blüthner also flat cut all over ? no V or W shapes ?), I was thinking about what could possibly "tune" the after ring. Backscale length somehow in tune or not, braiding pattern closer or looser come to mind, but as you said, in which proportion could this be really efficient ? So I can't help but thinking about the soundboard tuning (flame suit on). I read that Ron O does this after stringing by adding mass to the bridge, if I understood well. But couldn't a belly man fine tune the board before it is glued in the rim ? I mean, I don't think of a F or a F# as lowest proper resonance frequency (as was recently suggested, grin), but more achieve a certain proportionnality between the proper modes of the board, in the same way that violin makers still do. Localy adjust the panel or the ribs stiffness (not only letting the bass move more freely) could bring some of the otherwise inharmonic modes of the board into a partially more harmonic pattern that I suspect helping the whole thing breathe with more ease. Ok, the board is not a xylophone, and is first designed to achieve structural integrity and provide a surface for air contact, but eventually the board will resonate, and all of it's modes will respond in some amount to any note or chord input by the strings. Wouldn't it be beneficial if those modes themselves are sympathic to each other ? And the impedance holes problems, if any, wouldn't they be less obvious if all the modes were a bit higher, so the "distance" between the modes would be lineary reduced ? Couldn't the "one note kills" effect have to do with this ? Again, just a thought hoping to raise good comments from the list. Best regards. Stéphane Collin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "RicB" <ricb at pianostemmer.no> To: <pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:04 AM Subject: New Old Bluthner Soundboard Hi Stéphane Interesting point. Course we will have to see if I achieve more clarity and sustain first... :) The dampers are a bit smaller then modern pianos... but not a whole lot smaller. 68 notes have dampers if I remember correctly. The bass and the lower half of the long bridge were braided origionally btw. I wonder how much an unbraided backscale would compensate for the short sustain in the treble of such pianos as origionally manufactured. Perhaps we will never know for sure... but its an interesting train of thought. I'll keep this in mind as it gets put back together. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC