Dave.
With respect... and lots of it... I have to just respond to the part of
your post directed clearly at me. The Mic Ric bit is accepted in the
jovial spirit I am sure you meant it, just to get this reply off on a
nice note as it were.
You do make a charge... point shall we say about dallying close to a
danger zone followed up by underlining the false beat example I give has
nothing to do with tuning pins per se. I have to take issue this on at
least a couple counts.
#1. The neccessity or not of bringing in any particular example for the
sake of illustrating a point is a matter for the individual writing a
post to decide. IMHO readers should simply accept that a post is trying
to convey something meaningful and leave it at that.
#2 Failure to simple accept contributions on face value and start
reading into them side issues that may even perhaps be their is the real
danger zone. Why allow oneself to be provoked in the first place...
even if that was what a poster was trying to do ... which you dont
really know...
#3 I dont believe I ever tried to convey that the cause of false beats
had anything in practice to do with the whether tuning pins can
damage/be damaged in the course of years of use. Rather, and I think I
pretty clearly stated this... I drew an example of how opinions on a
matter based on what can be only seen as casual observance get presented
as fact... and indeed take root and in the end become myths accepted as
fact.
We scorn regularly at this kind of thing as it has happened in the
distant /not to distant past... but we just as regularly look past our
own eagerness to sew and give nourishment to new myths.
Not meaning any disrespect to Ed Foote... but (and by way of another
example) Just how does one ascertain the factual nature of the two main
claims he made in his post ? I have myself turned out pins 3 1/2 turns
for replacing strings for nigh on 35 years now. And my experience does
not, I say again does NOT, support the claim that this in anyway
whatsoever causes damage to the pin block or causes tuning pins to loose
so much torque that they are anywhere near untunable. In fact... I find
on older pianos the occurance of very low torque levels has no
correlation to which notes have had strings replaced at all. But... the
fact is.. that neither Ed or I have any kind of real data to begin with
to support a claim of fact.... let alone putting that data into the
perspective of an organized study.
My point is... we can share thoughts all day long... and thats fine.
But things here get presented as fact that clearly are not
substantiated. I am aware that some seem to find it annoying that I
keep raising this point... but for my part I consider it an important
one. Especially when apparently so many here are honestly and genuinely
concerned with ascertaining more piano-fakta and sifting away myth and
supposition (for not to say superstition).
Lastly... why really should any of this give cause or rise to
"combat"... as you put it ? Whats wrong with just expressing one views
in the spirit of polite discussion ? Why the need to beat (as in
combat) the other guy/gal up ? Sorry if my allusion to the False Beats
discussion took you off into some danger zone. It was just the best
example of the point I was trying to make at hand at the time.
Cheers
RicB
Dave Skolnik writes:
The most difficult aspect of responding to your question(s) is to
navigate through the "triggers" that would ultimately derail an
otherwise intelligent discussion of a reasonable question(s). Not
wanting to point any fingers, I'll just sort of lean in Mic Sprekne's
(name misspelled to protect identity) direction. I thoroughly
respect Ric Mic's formidable body of contributions, but, to prove to
myself that he's human, I'll occasionally look for something to
criticize. I think the last post in this thread dallied
unnecessarily in the danger zone...false beats and round or flat
earth controversy! While it may ultimately be related, there could
be so much to talk about before succumbing to the urge for
combat. DOWN! (there's always the midterm elections tomorrow ta
quench yr thirst fr blood, matey!)
I write "question(s)" because it IS two questions... tuning pin and
pinblock. This has nothing to do with bridge, bridge pins or false
beats, but you would want to be able to distinguish the behavior of
the tuning pin, as distinct from the block, in the almost infinite
permutations. I said almost. For the pins, consider the size,
composition, finish, consistency, method of fabrication, more. The
block...material selection, style (glue to wood ratio), drilling
techniques, more. Not to mention tuning pin bushings.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC