Hi Marcel
It strikes me that the whole scope of impact noises is probably one of
the most overlooked and underestimated bits of what the overall sound of
the instrument ends up being. We have this tendency to focus on the
sound the strings make and get all hung up in that. To the point that
many find it down right difficult if not impossible to understand how
one or another of the many impact noises actually can influence piano
tone. But they do... big time. Going to a more rigid shank will of
course have a price. I'm not saying you cant make it work... I'm just
saying you probably cant just count on it being a good thing without
further ado.
Cheers
RicB
I think there has to be some kink of balance. I remember old uprights
with cedar shanks in the treble section. When I replaced some of these
broken shanks with maple ones, the tone would get ugly. Mind you these
hammers were tapered a lot and were very light, but there must be a
reason why the cedar shanks produced such a good tone compared with
maple ones.
There is so much that happens when the hammer hit the strings that we
don't know. It's a very complex system and we only can try different
things, but going to just a more rigid shank might not solve all our
problems.
Marcel Carey, RPT
Sherbrooke, QC
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC