Hi Barbara
Couple things... In answer to holding to a SW line... there is nothing
that prevents you from creating your own SW curve here. Thats one of
the beauties of the Stanwood methodology... first and foremost (IMHO) it
is a system for balancing the leverage. You're only <<restriction>> is
to use SW's that are usable for the existing leverage... which implies a
limit on FW and is indeed the source of those FW maximums we keep
hearing about. But... if you are going for example for a 38gram BW
spec and your leverage is around 5.5 or so... you are perfectly free to
design in a curve that starts at 3/4 medium and ends at 1/4 highs.
Indeed, S&S seem to use a default flatter curve then Stanwoods default.
David S. should really pipe in here as he has lots of good stuff to say
on that subject.
As far as the <<big>> bit on hammers I mentioned in my last point. Dale
hit the point on the head. Of course you can only go so far... and to
some degree that is goverened again by our tastes. But at some point
even looking away from touchweight concerns... any hammer will just get
plain too big. Tho I had never thought of it in the way Dale hints at
below before... I think I agree that you would first notice the over
heaviness of a hammer set in the treble region. The reasoning he gives
is good for sure.
Cheers
RicB
Hi Dale,
Thanks for your response. Yes, I'd be interested in seeing the
specs. I certainly agree and have experienced the results of a too
heavy hammer in the treble. My biggest concern (as in the past) is
power. The last piano I did for an <impossible hall> had enough
power if the right pianist was playing it. Actually, there was only
one instance when I felt the piano was lacking and there was a
discussion on this list of the pianist's role in projection. If I
had that piano to do over again, there are a few things I would
change--even though the response to the piano was very positive.
So, now I might be facing another <impossible hall> and I know I
will have to experiement further with hammer weight. Do you follow
a SW line all the way through the piano, or do you go heavier lower
and then jump down in the treble?
Thanks.
Hi Barbara
Ric's point about heavier hammers is well taken but IMO most of the
volume increase will be from about note 52 down to the bottom &
generally the hammer will need to be stiffer to produce similar high
partial blend to a more usual/normal weight hammer. The reason is it
will take more time for the kinetic energy to be released into the
string & more time for the hammer to reverse directions & this can
be a real tone killer in the treble octaves. Ie. I don't like using
more than a 6 gram hammer on C-64 in general.
Otherwise with the heavier hammer the sound can be come too
fundamental laden. But it's just a voicing issue. Too heavy a
hammer in the treble means more potential due to damping by the
hammer, as the fundamental created by the initial pulse wave gets
back to the hammer before it leaves the string.
I personally like the shine that shows up in the overall tone with
the presence of even a small amount of lacquer in the hammers. I'm
installing a les stiff set of Renner blues in a 70's Hamburg D
presently & I know that they need & will easily tolerate a thin
solution of Laquer acetone or keytop & plastic. I will get the
tone I want.
BTW The original Renner hammers tend to be a pretty beefy hammer
weight wise. If you want to know I'll send the specs later along
with the action ratio.
Regards
Dale
Hmm, I was actually wondering about the power issue, since I've
heard more than once concerns about Renner hammers cutting through
the orchestra in a bigger hall. I've never heard of a problem
with a Hamburg Steinway being heard. There is a possibility that I
*may* have another big, not as big, but still big, dad hall to try
to fill. :) Since I hear oo-la-las about Hamburg Steinway pianos
(Yes, I understand that this is a NY piano) and groaning about the
hammers coming out of NY, I thought I'd test out Hamburg hammers as
another possibility. Actually I find the Hammers coming out the
factory to be quite good right now. I just installed a set in a
70's B that were pretty much instant music after shaping to a
serpintine shape & the usual weight prepping for an even strike
weights. I have added very samll amounts of juice in the treble &
the sound is lush fat & rich. Not clangy & thin.
Barbara Richmond, RPT
near Peoria, IL
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC