Annie, The "real" Acro's had the drop action -guided rail -pickup finger action.IMHO they are easier to work on than most spinets--I.E. the frozen grommet Kimball's !-- and in many cases continue to give good service with decent tuning stability. As for a recent list contention that they out perform some grand piano's I part company. Larry Fine's book states that when Baldwin stuck the Acro name on subsequent different models their contention was that Acrosonic was a furniture distinction not a name associated with a particular piano design. Whatever--. Tom Driscoll P.S. Phil --The truck is leaving for Ft. Myers today--Pitchers and catchers end of the week Annie Grieshop wrote: > But I'd swear I've worked on a number of Acrosonics that weren't > spinets. Last week, for example: an Acrosonic console built in the > late '80s. I've worked on several that were quite a bit older (and I'm > sure of that because they hadn't been tuned in decades by the time I saw > them). Am I still in the wrong era (universe?) or are Iowegian pianos > weird? There are some Acros that are consoles..and your timetable of the late 80's seems correct. -Phil Bondi(Fl)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC