Hi all
I have to concur with Jurgen on the quality of older Rönisch
instruments. Prior to the 40's in anycase they seemed quite well put
together. Older Feurich is one of my favorites over here. And the newer
ones are not really bad instruments at all IMHO. And if any piano
seemed to have survived the socialist period of eastern Europe with any
real quality intact besides Petrof I'd agree that Förster would be a
very good candidate for nomination.
The war and subsequent changes that swept over eastern and western
Europe had no doubt a huge impact on the development of pianos and the
market at large.... come to think of it.... maybe Steinway's dominance
would not have stood up had Europe not gone through that ....eh...
evolution.
Cheers
RicB
Stéphane, Ric et al:
I own a 1911 Rönisch with buckskin covered tails, and I have seen a
few
more. I can't say how standard this feature was, but they obviously
did it in a good number of pianos over quite a period of time. My
hammers were badly worn and needed replacement, but for sake of
originality and to preserve the good checking this allows I decided
to
have he hammers re-felted, and have been quite happy with the
results.
I am a bit surprised that your piano seems to be cheaply made,
Stéphane. Rönisch were known to have excellent designs and
workmanship, right up there with Förster, Feurich and others. Perhaps
in the 1920s things were already in serious decline...
regards,
Jurgen Goering
Piano Forte Supply
(250) 754-2440
info at pianofortesupply.com
http://www.pianofortesupply.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC