That's very strange. That anyone would go to the
trouble of putting a Welte into a Steinway. I'm not
doubting you, but wonder if it wasn't built as a Welte
( on custom order, or in Germany ) originally.
An early reproducer, perhaps.
Peace,
Peace,
G
--- william ballard <yardbird at vermontel.net> wrote:
> Yo, Thump,
>
> On Jul 2, 2007, at 9:00 PM, gordon stelter wrote:
> > My impressioin is that the Duo Art version of the
> "O"
> > was called an "OR". The "X" designation was only
> used
> > for the "M"reproducer, perhaps because "Mr" would
> have
> > looked a bit silly ?
> > Thump
>
> I'm guessing the "X" is like the county hospital's
> entry under
> "Father of Newborn". They don't want to acknowledge
> anything about
> it. But you probably know more than I do about it.
> If nothing else,
> this piano is an "ex-" O.
>
>
> It had (as I remember) a Welte player retro-fitted
> where the Duo-Art
> was. And after that that and a cheap set of hammers,
> it's still a
> very fine sounding O. The current pedals and lyre
> are barely
> functional: it really needs a Stwy lyre to be a real
> piano for this
> summer chamber music program.
>
> Thanks for replying. I the meantime, I've decided
> that the keybed
> stiffener plank should be solid, and that it won't
> be that difficult
> to locate. I'm routing out for the female locking
> plate before the
> plank gets attached to the keybed. Triangulation.
> Nothing trickier
> than, say, finding the right location for a new back
> action.
>
> Mr. Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC