> There are a few problems I have with the theory of harder bridge cap > material influencing the sound as described. I basically agree. If the maple cap is soft and compliant enough, or the pin fit is not tight at the top, allowing deflection with string vibrations, it's absorbing energy. New maple caps don't typically show these kind of problems, but I'm told by people who have had access to adequate measuring means, that laminated and very dense caps are somewhat less absorptive and lossy, though not necessarily audibly so. Make the cap less compliant without significantly increasing mass, and you'll likely find that it is the mass in the exotic wood capping that's making a difference - assuming there is an audible difference. Also, there's a lot of talk about vibration in bridges. Consider that by the time a string at C-8 goes through the "pressure" half of it's fundamental cycle, the pressure impulse imparted to the pin by the string has traveled clear through the bridge to about 15cm (6") below the soundboard, and about a Meter along the bridge. Double those distances for one full fundamental cycle at C-8, and I wonder what vibrations there might be within the bridge that do anything at all of any importance that a harder wood cap will influence. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC