Agreed as far as it goes... but Bob does make one assumption which we cant be sure of. He assumes the guy/gal responsible for the work actually did do his/her best and that the result was then simply a result of the person not being "ready" for the job. We dont actually know this. Either way for that matter, which makes Bobs obering words a bit timely. I also wrote a post similar in tone to Deans... i.e. assuming this was a bit of a rip-off. The fact that it actually, and so easily can be the case both ways reveals one of the weaknesses of the market economy Bob describes. I know there are those who believe that in the end a truly "bad tech" will be an unprofitable proposition. But I've seen plenty exceptions to this rule. There was/is this guy living in the north Seattle area whom is just downright impossible to believe. A house full of total piano junk... front yard full of chemical junk... and still year in year out the fellow sells for 2-3000 dollars totally useless (read destroyed requiring total rebuild) instruments to those perennial suckers born every minute one hears about from time to time. Still... in this case we dont know which is the case... and the main thrust of Bobs post holds true. Honesty in the end pays off... it IS a question of responsibility more then blame. Good post Bob RicB Hi Bob A beautiful dispassionate non judgmental evaluation of skill level vs. consequence. We are all at different places in our learning curve. I have experienced this on numerous occasions in my own career & I can heartily say, don't over estimate your own ability when in doubt & do not be afraid to network with others who's opinion you value. The lsit is perfect forum to implement this philosophy. My Thanks, my Friend Dale
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC