I'll admit that I know little of this, and have,
in the past, just been happy if it "looks pretty
good".
But I'm about to restore the finest upright I've
ever seen: a 1902
Ivers and Pond scale 19, 56" tall, and want to be
more
"scientifical".
It does have bearing all along the bridge, but I
wonder if it's
enough, or even too much ? ( There seems to be plenty
in the bass, also. )
I was planning to re-crown the board ( a la D.L.
Bullock's system, which hes' successfully used for
years --and I'll be very happy to share ) but don't
want to "overdo it" !
In any event, this seems an ideal opportunity to
share
"before and after" specs with everyone, about how well
this system works,
So:
I have the brass thingee from Schaff, and feeler
guages, the dial indicator bearing checker with three
feet ( also from Schaff ) and an old busted Lowell
guage. ( Which I'd get another of, if convinced it was
worth it. )
Which of these should I use, and what would be
acceptable measurements for a HUGE old upright like
this? Can I determine it with the brass thingee and
the feeler guages, or the dial indicator ?
Or do I need the angle of deflection indicated by the
Lowell guage ?
( Sorry for being such a dope. )
Thump
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC