David. I was simply responding to a post in which you responded to one of my posts. http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/2007-October/211584.html If misunderstandings occur, as they often do in the course of any discussion, one simply works them out. Otherwise, differences in experience, tastes and preferences are commonplace do not constitute a reason to get ruffled. I read as carefully as anyone, and do not engage in accusations about whos wasting the list time, who doesnt know this or that, or as is in this case "generally oversimplify, misstate, distort, mispresent..." I do none of these things in reality. If you post anything on this list, it is subject to comment and question... by anyone else. You dont hesitate to fire off potent broadsides whenever you wish. For my part... I endeavour to keep my posts as topical and non-personal as I can. And on that note.. back to the actual topic of the discussion... I still am earnestly curious about the question I posed. And fwiw the commentary about stability of lacquer was simple edification... relation of observation as to how many people have different opinions on the matter. Not a big deal. Cheers RicB I would really prefer that you not attempt to quote me, paraphrase or interpret my remarks as you It wastes my time and the list's for my having to clarify which, in this case, I won't bother to do. Read again, and more carefully, if you choose, but spare me any further comments. The issue I spoke about is when lacquer in a hammer is perceptible and when it isn't. The stability of lacquer I qualified it as my own experience. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC