Hi Dean. Interesting to see this concept in such an old instrument. Do you have a production year for this piano ? Also interesting discussion. Again tho... we see concepts that have been thrown out and more or less presented as new or re-newed that have in fact been tried out and rejected by the industry at large over the past century or so... like the transition bridge and other such suggestions. I have to wonder if the reason for this has to do with the empirical nature the dominate piano <<sound>> that emerged was arrived at, which in turn was a very good measure of what human kind taken as a whole decided was <<best sounding>>. Individuals may like other acoustical behavior better to be sure. As an example I'd point out the Phoenix instrument from Steingræber and the Stuart and Sons instrument. Very cool with all that sustain up there in the treble, but comments I've heard from musicians I've talked to about that immediately point out that there is virtually no music written for this kind of sustain usage. To take that a bit further.... recent experience tells me that more then very moderately short sustain times typically found in popular constructions that are some years old do, by and large, not seem all that welcome amoung pianists after all. When one actually takes too much of the percussive ping away.... then one evidently limits ones audience quite a bit. Cheers RicB Attached is a 6 foot Hallet Davis with a treble fish on steroids. It has something of a bass cutoff and then what looks like another fish under the bass bridge. Very curious. It has agraffes all the way up plus agraffes on the bridge. I am refinishing this piano which is hand grained rosewood. Don't know how I'm going to put it back, yet. Dean May
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC