At 00:07 -0500 18/4/08, kurt baxter wrote: >Even so, that pitch drop has to come from SOMEWHERE. >I have heard the same statement that wire "creeping" stretch is >physically impossible, and it seems unlikely that the physicists are >massive wrong on this.. > >here is one example of a frustrated physicist ranting about the >belief of piano tuners: ><http://www.mmdigest.com/Archives/Digests/200204/2002.04.02.08.html>http://www.mmdigest.com/Archives/Digests/200204/2002.04.02.08.html Since when was Craig Brougher a "frustrated physicist"?! He's just a vocal mender of player pianos. >But still, my question stands: on a otherwise perfectly settled, >broken in piano, whydoes a replacement new string drop and drop and >drop? Where is it all coming from? > >Clearly, someone is missing something. At 21:13 +0100 13/4/08, John Delacour wrote: Subject: Re: stretching wire -- a preliminary test >When plucked about 24 hours later a fall in the pitch of the note of >4 or 5 cents was noted. > >48 hours later the note is 9 or 10 cents flat. When tested after 4 days the note was still about 10 cents flat with no detectable further extension. If I were to bring it to pitch I would expect it over the following two or three days to fall a few cents in pitch and then stabilize again. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC