Grin... nothing like cutting through the back and forths and just answering someones question. That said, these tables are contingent upon the actual speaking lengths being what they are supposed to be. The idea of the duplex('s) was to configure some pre-determined fractional relationship to the speaking length into the back and front lengths, yes ? RicB At 20:17 +0200 30/7/08, b98tu at t-online.de <https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives> wrote: >/Do you have the measures in milimeters? / Style S Note# 43 = 5-3/32" 129.4 mm. Note# 54 = 3-3/32" 78.6 mm. Note# 55 = 2-13/16" 71.4 mm. Note# 71 = 1-21/32" 42.1 mm. Note# 72 = 1-15/32" 37.3 mm. Note# 88 = 0-15/16" 23.8 mm. Style L Note# 44 = 4-31/32" 126.2 mm. Note# 54 = 3-3/32" 78.6 mm. Note# 55 = 2-13/16" 71.4 mm. Note# 71 = 1-21/32" 42.1 mm. Note# 72 = 1-15/32" 37.3 mm. Note# 88 = 0-15/16" 23.8 mm. Style M Note# 42 = 4-1/4" 107.9 mm. Note# 54 = 3-1/32" 77.0 mm. Note# 55 = 2-13/16" 71.4 mm. Note# 71 = 1-21/32" 42.1 mm. Note# 72 = 1-15/32" 37.3 mm. Note# 88 = 0-15/16" 23.8 mm. Style B Note# 40 = 3-27/32" 97.6 mm. Note# 51 = 1-13/16" 46.0 mm. Note# 52 = 3-11/32" 84.9 mm. Note# 68 = 1-15/32" 37.3 mm. Note# 69 = 1-13/16" 46.0 mm. Note# 88 = 0-31/32" 24.6 mm. Style D Note# 37 = 7-5/8" 193.7 mm. Note# 53 = 3-7/32" 81.8 mm. Note# 54 = 3-1/16" 77.8 mm. Note# 71 = 2-9/16" 65.1 mm. Note# 72 = 3-1/4" 82.5 mm. Note# 88 = 1-31/32" 50.0 mm. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC