OK, now tell me how you really feel. anon -------------------------------------------------- From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman at cox.net> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 10:45 AM To: <toddpianoworks at att.net>; <pianotech at ptg.org> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Todays Appointment > > >> The piano is a 1916 Lyon & Healy Player Upright. The history she gave >> me was that she bought for about $4,000 from a private owner who had >> supposedly restored it in 2001. When she said it was restored I was NOT >> expecting what I discovered. > > What you describe is exactly what I've discovered and come to > expect for the last 30+ years. "Player people" generally know > and care absolutely nothing about pianos. The mouse detritus > may or may not even have been shoveled out, but the piano is > almost always in it's original condition of advanced > decomposition, and is typically nearly unplayable by any > reasonable standard. The case is nearly always refinished, > sometimes nicely, and new keytops have been installed, badly, > and not trimmed to fit the key. With the original key bushings > still in, this makes for an exceptionally professional result. > The hammers are shaped with what seems to have been a > chainsaw, with the moldings hitting the strings in the top > octave, and the action is so worn out it can't possibly be > regulated. The player is typically poorly and incompletely > done as well. The valves are original, replaced with something > that has no hope of working, like heavy steel washers surfaced > with Neoprene, or incompetently reworked, with no apparent > understanding of gapping or seating requirements. Pouches > could be made of anything at all, and dished randomly, again, > with no apparent understanding of what they should do. > Pneumatics likely haven't been re-hinged, and the hinges are > probably so full of PPCo's plastic glue (PVC-E, for > "flexibility") that they won't collapse under vacuum. Gaskets > original (possibly greased), and pumpers covered with water > base contact cement with scrap leather gussets (sheepskin, > left over from their pump organ work) at the cracked corners > so they don't even have to re-cover the things. They amazingly > work, sometimes - sort of. > > This is exactly the kind of ignorant hack junk work attitude > that needs to die from the planet. There's no reason these > people can't attempt to learn something about what they do to > make money, except that they won't. So far, the almost > universal whine has been that they can't take the time to do > anything right (they know how, of course, but just can't), > because nobody will pay what it takes to do it right. That's > true. Very few will. That's because there are still plenty of > cheap hacks quite willing to take the job for 10% of what it > would take to do it well, and rip them off. "I make good money > working on this junk", they brag. But questioning them on what > it takes to do any of it right indicates that they think they > know only what they think they need to know to do what they're > minimally doing, and aren't interested in knowing or doing > ANYTHING more, even at risk of increasing their income and > improving their reputation. They'll defend their ignorance to > the bloody death, and probably call you an elitist snob for > suggesting anything else. > > So I'll still service the players I've rebuilt through the > years. but I'm not interested in dealing with and being > responsible for anyone else's lousy player work any more > unless they want it rebuilt - which it almost certainly needs. > There have been very rare exceptions, but well over 90% of the > player work I've seen from other people has been as I describe. > > Ron N > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20081221/1e69e5ba/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC