I dont see the relevance to the question about how much compression gets imparted into the panel when a given RC&S board gets subjected to enough downbearing to reduce its crown to 25 % (or any given amount for that matter) of its original height....which is the subject matter of the last few posts on this thread. Cheers RicB Percent residual crown doesn’t tell you much in a system that has variable radius control. If you start with a rib that has 10 mm of crown and deflect it 5 mm it has 50% left. If you start with a rib with 5 mm of crown and deflect it 5 mm it has 0%. But they both have the same amount of deflection for the given load. Targeted amounts of crown in pure CC boards are different because you are more limited to the amount of crowning you can get by virtue of panel compression. Like Ron, I would be interested to know from those of you do pure CC assemblies what your stated goals are in terms of crown and what you can realistically hope to achieve along specified rib lengths. My own view is that it is this unpredictability (among other things) that is a large part of the problem with pure CC boards. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC