Hi Bruce My own take on this is that its doesnt matter much which order you do these things. The only stablity issue I can see would be related to the back scale tension, and that is quite easily addressed by itself later on if one feels one has to. As far as string seating itself. I'm more or less on the side of those who view this whole area with a good deal of caution... for not to say outright skepticsm. I do believe that string seating is a necessary proceedure and reject outright claims that the need can not exist if there is a condition of positive actual bearing... i.e. that strings can not find themselves stuck up the pins a tad. That said I also believe that the minimal amount of force should be applied to assure contact between string and bridge. IME a shank on the string over the bridge surface itself is enough to do the job. One only needs a very slight tap... or even less a slight massage motion just behind each pin. YMMV RicB -------------- Thank you for addressing the subject. I have a follow up question to the string seating issue. Is there a logical sequence to seating the entire string including lifting or mating strings to hammers. My concern is tuning stability, ensuring that one step in the process doesn't decrease the effectiveness of future steps in the process. Is it preferrable to start at the bridge, tap at the contact points to the hitch pin, then work from the other side of the bridge all the way to the tuning pin, then mate or lift strings? Should we mate strings first, then proceed from the ends to the bridge? Should the mating be inserted in the middle of the process? Ideas???? Bruce Pennington
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC