While equal front/back bearing is a good goal, I'd say more important is that the front has positive bearing. A slight favoring of the front of the bridge as a hedge against ending up with a back positive and front negative is, in my view, the prudent approach. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ron Nossaman Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:47 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Downbearing William Monroe wrote: > I suppose I can see the argument for not loosing sleep over front and > back not being exactly equal, but my concern is more for something like > Frank described, and similar but not so severe cases. I think it is of > practical importance to assure myself that there isn't anything > ridiculous going on front to back, making sure any net bearing reading > is meaningful. In other words, net bearing, but not in a vacuum. I'm > not suggesting you don't look at other parameters here, Ron, just wanted > to make explicit my thinking. Gotcha. Sure, I look at component bearing too, hence the narrow set of feet on my Wixey base, I'm just not concerned if the angles aren't equal. I have measured negative rear bearing angles in the field, in pianos that sounded quite nice, incidentally. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC