My personal preference is the SATIII, primarily because it is it's own machine. Verituer is the same. A dedicated tool for a specific purpose. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with an RCT, (I have not worked with a Tunelab), but the battery life itself on a SAT is so much longer than the other models, that it really does make it a lot more convenient. Just my own preference.? Willem (Wim) Blees, RPT Piano Tuner/Technician Mililani, Oahu, HI 808-349-2943 Author of: The Business of Piano Tuning available from Potter Press www.pianotuning.com -----Original Message----- From: Rob McCall <rob at mccallpiano.com> To: pianotech at ptg.org Sent: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:37 am Subject: [pianotech] ETD suggestions I hope I'm not opening up a large can of worms here (yet somehow I feel I am) but I'd like to know what sort of ETD device or software is recommended and the reasons for your preference.? ? I'm learning to tune aurally because I think it's vitally important to have that as a skill set. I'm thoroughly enjoying the process, as well.? ? After reading many of your posts on the aural vs. ETD topic, I realize the importance of having an ETD, as well. I'm somewhat of a geek when it comes to technology, too!? ? So... Pros and cons of what you use? CyberTuner, Tunelab, Sanderson Accu-tuner, Peterson Auto-Strobe... Others?? ? I use a Mac, and I refuse to get a PC :-) so any PC only option is out for me, but others might find the information helpful.? ? Thanks in advance!? ? Rob McCall? Murrieta, CA? ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090404/f6d28ebf/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC