Hmm... perhaps you are onto something there David. I think I'll call it my "Common sense" template. Btw... Kluge makes keys for both NY and Hamburg. Apparently, key stiffness is not an issue with anyone outside of a few techs stateside. Seriously tho... the issue deserves closer examination. Cheers RicB David Ilvedson wrote: > Ah, yes...Ric is back... '-] > > I think you have a form letter on your computer and you just change a few piano items around and send it out... '-] > > "never really been even close to quantified in any real sense of the word". > "I dont see it written in stone" > "don't really see pianists making any kind of a point out of this." > > How many times have we seen these words? '-] > > Remember, Ric we are working on NY Steinways over here... '-] > > David Ilvedson, RPT > Pacifica, CA 94044 > > ----- Original message ---------------------------------------- > From: "Richard Brekne" <ricbrek at broadpark.no> > To: pianotech at ptg.org > Received: 2/13/2009 9:02:22 AM > Subject: Re: [pianotech] S&S "D" Keys with Attachments on To > > > >> One understands the general rational to be sure. Its just that the whole >> thing has never really been even close to quantified in any real sense >> of the word. Then too... I don't really see pianists making any kind of >> a point out of this. If the general, albeit vague, consensus of pianists >> assessment is laid to bear on the subject... then this seems less then a >> necessary procedure. I dont see it written in stone that the delay >> between key depression and hammer string contact that can be traced to >> key flexure is something pianists do not appreciate. That said... I >> have a few Yamaha's laying around that have a horrible delay feeling on >> a hard blow... and key flexure has nothing to do with it. >> > > >> Not to dispute the desirability of stiffer keys on some instruments out >> of hand... I just think it would be valuable to better quantify the >> relationship between key stiffness, action compliance otherwise, and how >> pianists react to various configurations. >> > > >> Cheers >> RicB >> > > > >> The basis is that they flex too much and you lose power at the upper >> end. When Steinway went to the accelerated action they removed the >> lower shoe in order to make room for the bearing. On a D, in >> particular, with extra key length that reduction in height adds >> unwanted flex and it is easily demonstrated as well as felt on hard >> blows with a delay between key depression and hammer string >> contact. Restoring the original height of the key with an elongated >> top shoe also restores much of the lost stiffness. Keys can be too >> stiff, I suppose, but it is not likely to happen in this situation. >> > > >> David Love >> www.davidlovepianos.com >> > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC