[pianotech] Steinway A Bass String Rescaling

BobDavis88 at aol.com BobDavis88 at aol.com
Sat May 23 18:31:53 MDT 2009


Sounds right to me. I'm glad there are now choices. I think that the  
independents are independent because they're, well, independent. They may  be 
cranky cusses just like us piano techs, and each of us will get  along with 
certain ones better than others.  
 
And please excuse me for repeating myself in the previous message. I first  
wrote in paragraph form, then in reply form for clarity; then forgot to 
erase  the paragraph. Or I'm getting...what is that word? Oh  yes... senile....
BD
 
 
In a message dated 5/23/2009 2:54:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes:

 
I  agree with you then.  Overall, what I’m looking for in a string maker  
is: 
1.        Quality  and consistency of windings and that includes matched 
unisons, equal winding  terminations (looks count), accuracy in terms of 
lengths that I  provide. 
2.        Willingness  to work with me on custom scale designs including 
input if they feel I am  asking for something that may have a problem in the  
design. 
3.        Willingness  to correct mistakes they make without making me jump 
through hoops, beg or  threaten. 
4.        Reasonable  speed and price. 
5.        Overall  pleasant to work with. 
All  of those criteria are met in different ways by different houses and to 
varying  degrees. 
My  own current preference is John at JD Grandt.  I know others have been  
happy with other independent makers and even some larger houses.  Each  
person has their own set of criteria. 
 
David  Love 
www.davidlovepianos.com
 
 
From:  pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On 
Behalf Of  BobDavis88 at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 2:04  PM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Steinway  A Bass String Rescaling

 
I guess I  didn't understand you. I don't deny that correct scaling is 
important. I was  just saying that in our experience the prowess of the winder 
was very  important too. By the "big houses" I meant specifically Schaff and 
Mapes, as  opposed to the smaller independents. 
 

 
BD
 

 
In a  message dated 5/23/2009 1:36:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes:

Not  sure what you mean by the big houses.  
 
Schaff and  Mapes, as opposed to the small independents, like Arledge, 
Grandt, GC, Isaac,  Sanderson.

I  tend to use JD Grandt and have had no problems with mismatched unisons 
that  I hear frequently on Schaff or Mapes strings.
 
That's what  I was saying. They can even be the same scale, and the unisons 
 will almost always come out audibly better from the smaller  [admittedly 
more expensive] independents.

Similarly, Arledge I don’t see a problem.  I’m more referring to the  
magic of winding versus the importance of correct scaling.
 
Maybe it  isn't magic, but their strings do sound better, independent of 
the scale.  That's all I was saying. I may have misunderstood you; I  thought 
"everything  to do with scaling choices they make and not the mythical 
string  winder" sounded as  if you were dismissing the winder.
 

 
BD

 
David  Love 
www.davidlovepianos.com
 
 
From:  pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On 
Behalf Of  BobDavis88 at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:21  AM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech]  Steinway A Bass String Rescaling

 
In a  message dated 5/22/2009 8:49:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes:

[SNIP]...The  rave reviews you hear about the magic of
string winding from GC or  anybody else and how great their strings sound 
has
everything to do  with scaling choices they make and not the mythical string
winder they  have hiding in the back room.  

David Love
_www.davidlovepianos.com_ (http://www.davidlovepianos.com/) 
 

 
We've  been using GC for quite a while, and my sense is that the pairs are 
more  equally wound than strings from the big houses; therefore pairs match 
each  other better up the partial ladder. Apart from the scaling, I do hear  
cleaner unisons.
 

 
Bob  D




 
  
____________________________________
 

A  strong credit score is 700 or above. _See  Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!_ 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585033x1201462753/aol?redir=http
://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=Maystro
ngfooter52309NO115) 

 
  
____________________________________
 
A  strong credit score is 700 or above. _See  Yours in Just 2 Easy  Steps!_ 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585033x1201462753/aol?redir=htt
p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=Maystr
ongfooter52309NO115) 



**************A strong credit score is 700 or above. See Yours in Just 2 
Easy Steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585033x1201462753/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&b
cd=Maystrongfooter52309NO115)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090523/eba3bc2c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC