Ron, stop it. Chill out. You're feeling an edge from him that isn't there...this is just a discussion. Relax. Deep breaths. Really. With sincerity, love, affection, and respect, brother..... DA On Feb 7, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Ron Nossaman wrote: > PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: >> All worthwhile considerations. Yet it is striking, no pun intended, >> as has been pointed out, that RC&S boards _seem_ to need less >> hammer movement. > > Why is this so threatening to you? Two people who design and build > these systems in the real world have indicated that it is either > less necessary, or altogether unnecessary to deviate from a straight > strike line for tonal purposes in a RC&S board. If you, not having > built boards like this at all, so lacking any experience with same, > know better than those of us who have, why don't you inform us as to > why we don't know what we're talking about instead of weaseling > around this semantic bullshit? If you're not interested in learning > anything outside your marketable experience, that's your call, but > someone else might be. This information has been offered in all > honesty as real and verified as valid by building the damned things > and trying it. If you have anything real and pertinent to contribute > besides speculation and misdirection, please do. > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC