David, Of course that's what we'd all like to do . . . only the best on every job. But . . . on some pianos, for some customers, compromises are definitely OK. It's not as if I ever see any broken agraffes on these old B+ American grands. Practicality makes more music . . . . . D On Mar 2, 2010, at 5:08 PM, David Love wrote: > Terry: > > That would be Paul R-J. > > Denise: > > I agree that painted agraffes look very cheesy but I do think they should be removed and at least dressed (if not polished). I always replace. Once they’re out why not—unless it’s one of those MHs where the thread diameter and count are no longer produced. > > David Love > www.davidlovepianos.com > > From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Denise Rachel > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:02 PM > To: pianotech at ptg.org > Subject: Re: [pianotech] finishing plates > > Hi, > > One more idea to throw in here. I dislike painted agraffes, so on pianos where I am not replacing or refinishing them, I put bullet casings over them during spraying. The original agraffes stay clean. > > D > > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Terry Farrell wrote: > > > Maybe someone can chime in and identify the issue, but a couple years back someone published an very thorough excellent article in the PTG Journal all about prepping (shaping/polishing) new and used agraffes. I've been following the procedures described in the article and find the results very much worthwhile. > > Terry Farrell > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:20 AM, reggaepass at aol.com wrote: > > > Al, > > At what point do you replace agraffes rather than recondition them? And do you use this method on new ones as well as used? > > Alan Eder > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100302/b217744b/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC