We have the 'tool police', and I thought we had the 'english' police, but I forget who. As long as the intent is understood, who cares about the spelling. It is not as if it is a court of law, where the absence of a comma causes major problems. When you read the rest of the sentence, it is normally not a problem to see what is meant. i.e. the apostrophe before the '60 or after 60'. We all new that it wasn't a 60 foot spinet. But we had some fun with it. John Ross Windsor, Nova Scotia On 24-May-10, at 2:33 PM, Ron Nossaman wrote: > Mike Spalding wrote: >> and, the proof is not IN the pudding. The proof OF the pudding is >> IN the eating. >> Mike >> Kent Swafford wrote: >>> Hear, hear! >>> >>> (Not "Here, here.") >>> >>> >>> Kent > > And it ain't a wetstone, it's a whetstone. As in whet, not wet, your > appetite. > > And about 78,003 others that I don't even notice. > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC