[pianotech] A432 Tuning Fork

tnrwim at aol.com tnrwim at aol.com
Wed Jan 19 11:40:11 MST 2011


Patrick

Sorry, you're right. I was never very good at math. 

WIm






-----Original Message-----
From: J Patrick Draine <jpdraine at gmail.com>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2011 8:29 am
Subject: Re: [pianotech] A432 Tuning Fork


Wim,
Check your math! 6 cents FLAT of A-440 would be roughly 438.5 cps. (if it was PLUS 6 cents it would be 441.5 cps).
Patrick (no math wiz) Draine


On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, <tnrwim at aol.com> wrote:

Jim
 
An A fork that is 6 cents low is not at A432. At A, there are four cents per beat. So a fork that is 6 cents flat is at A442.5. It shouldn't take much to file throat of the fork to reach 440. 
 
Wim






-----Original Message-----
From: James Sasso <jwsasso at gmail.com>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2011 6:11 am
Subject: [pianotech] A432 Tuning Fork




Hello Everyone; 
I just bought a John Walker tuning fork from Schaff in preparation for my tuning exam. All electronic instruments indicate this fork is 6-8 cents flat at room temperature.  I'd like to get some feedback as to options. My other forks average average to within 2 cents of C5 and A4 but the A4 one is aluminum. I was thinking of keeping and filing the John Walker fork, but wouldn't 6-8 cents require an awful lot of filing and mutilation of the fork? Another option would be to return the current one and ask Schaff to send one closer to A440. A final option I've considered is to purchase a Sanderson Accu-fork ($165 Pianotek). Any comments would be appreciated. 
Thanks,
Jim






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110119/f4a3b98a/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC