I started out using an ETD, still do but am being mentored in aural. I find the ETD eases some of the stress of knowing which side I'm on and how close, esp in the ext treble where you can get out of ear shot very quickly. Lately I've been checking the ext treble with double octaves and octave and a fifth, see where that leaves me on the ETD and adjust accordingly. Les K LK Piano Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:12:30 -0600 From: Brian Trout <brian_trout at hotmail.com> To: <pianotech at ptg.org> Subject: Re: [pianotech] aural tuning Message-ID: <SNT134-w3756045A2868569B40797F8EFF0 at phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I've heard some very good aural tunings. I've heard some truly awful aural tunings. I've heard some very good "machine" tunings. I've heard some truly awful "machine" tunings. When I was tuning nearly fulltime, I used both. When asked, I said that I used the machine but my ear was the final authority and could tune either with or with out it just fine. And that's the way I liked it best. The machine was useful in setting some temperaments on some nearly untunable scales saving much aggrivation. At times, I did not like where the machine would put the stretch on either end and would routinely tweak things towards where my ear found it more pleasant to listen to. A good aural tuner can find a useful tool in a good "machine". A good "machine" tuner can find that well developed aural skills can make the "machine tunings" considerably better. I suspect the skill of the person using the tools has a lot to do with the outcome of a tuning. Just my take. Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110126/5596d74c/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC