[pianotech] ETD tuning during temperature changes

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Thu Jan 27 13:35:38 MST 2011


Ryan Sowers wrote:

"how is the next generation of tuners going to find the inspiration to pick
up this important skill which is at the heart of our craft?"








I think this is a bit of the fallacy of the appeal to belief.  The
suggestion is that etd users don't acquire the important skills that are at
the heart of the craft.  That's just a wrong assumption.  First, most (if
not all) etd users tune unisons by ear.  The essential skills required for
our tuning craft can all be found in acquiring the skill of tuning solid
unisons.  The issue of tuning has less to do with our ability to hear what
our target is and more to do with learning how to get it there and keep it
there.  Those of us who pursue this profession tend to be inclined toward
good hearing skills.  Learning to hear coincident partials, a narrow fifth,
an expanded fourth, 7 beats per second, a sequence if increasingly beating
thirds, clean unisons is a small part of the battle, in my view.  Learning
to manipulate the tuning pin and tuning hammer in a controlled way is what
takes the effort.  If we could simply turn a dial and stop it when the
desired pitch is reached tuning would be relatively easy.  When you stick a
lever and flexible pin in the way it changes everything.   The notion that
etd users shut their ears once the machine gets turned on is also a false
belief.  Similarly that they don't tweak the machine settings and refine the
calculated tuning based on their own  professional judgment.  Any suggestion
otherwise is more a comment on one's own practices than it is a fair comment
on anyone else's.  

But there's another issue here that we've not really discussed and that has
to do with compensation and fees.  When I tuned aurally (and I consider
myself a very skilled tuner) it took me about 1 hour and 20 minutes to do a
careful tuning.  Add a pitch raise and it was two hours if I got the pitch
raise right the first time, which wasn't always the case.  That seems to
comport with David Andersen's own admissions, somebody I consider a very
skilled aural tuner.  With an ETD I can do that same careful tuning in 45
minutes.  A pitch raise (and an accurate one) in 15 minutes.  That's half
the time.  My basic fee (and I won't say what it is here but you can look on
my website) is based on a 1+  hour appointment.  My customers get what I can
accomplish in that time for my basic fee.  So, if the piano is on pitch it's
45 minutes to tune it and 15+ minutes to do whatever else.  That whatever
else might be a pitch raise in which case I'm done in my basic fee time and
they pay me my basic fee.  If there's no pitch raise I'll spend the extra
time doing what I see fit and that will vary depending on need.  The use of
the etd allows me to be consistently efficient and deliver a better product
in a shorter time frame.  So what do I do?  I can decide that I really enjoy
the challenge and personal satisfaction of tuning aurally but it takes me
twice as long and I accomplish less in a given amount of time as far as the
customer is concerned.  Should I then charge double to my customers so that
I can have my personal satisfaction?  Or should I work that extra time for
free?  No difference in the quality of the product, mind you.  Just an issue
of what gives me more pleasure, how much time it takes, and what I then need
to charge for my time.  What do you imagine my customers would say?  Don't
wonder too long, I can tell you.  Do they really care how I do it or do they
care that I'm efficient, get done what needs doing and deliver a quality
product for a predictable fee?  

That's where my hobbyist remark comes from. If I'm doing this for fun (and
that doesn't mean without a high level of skill) then who cares.  But if I'm
doing this to make a living, maximize my earning potential and want to
deliver a quality product to my customer in the most efficient, consistent
and professional way that doesn't cause them to have to pay additional and
unnecessary charges because I choose to take twice as long when I didn't
really have to, then what is the responsible and, perhaps, most ethical way
to think of this?  Is refusing to use the most modern technologies available
because of some false belief, personal pride or pleasure mentality not
potentially doing our customers a disservice?    I think it is.  

David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com






More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC