Humm Sounds a little like the health care program. >>g<< Joe Goss BSMusEd MMusEd RPT imatunr at srvinet.com www.mothergoosetools.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman at cox.net> To: <pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [pianotech] [OT] Stuff Which Should Really Be on PTG-L > On 7/2/2011 2:44 PM, Dale Probst wrote: >> >> I know that the Member Max/Higher Logic interface was how we came to HL. > > > >> I'm pretty sure from my conversations with Board members that they want >> the best they can get. > > For whom? That's the core of this discussion. > > > I have been told that if HL doesn't work, we will >> go another direction. > > Again, doesn't work for whom? The pianotech forum already doesn't work for > a considerable number of us, but I don't see any signs of movement > addressing basic function. And is "another direction" another $75K or more > spent without care as to whether the list communities will find the > replacement adequate? We've all been told a lot of stuff, but it's all > very fuzzy and unaccountable. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This thing showed up in February as one giant impenetrable ink cloud. From > then to now, we just a couple of days ago got figures on what it cost, and > still can't seem to get information other than "we're working on it". > Since our questions mostly concern the lists and the answers are either > hopelessly vague or office administration specific, will we ever know what > "it" is? >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ron N >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC