On 7/13/2011 1:58 PM, David Love wrote: > I know that argument has been made but unless someone can actually show me > how a panel crowned by simply gluing it into the rim without any ribs > attached at a low EMC that causes it to crown up will be structurally more > capable of load bearing (let's put stability aside for a minute) than one in > which ribs are attached and caused to bend by panel compression prior to > gluing it into the piano then I don't buy it. Jeez man, what the hell are you drinking? No one that I know of has ever claimed anything remotely like that. Read the posts. Read what they say. There's nothing like that here. >Because that's the > implication, that the unribbed panel when compression crowned will have > superior load bearing properties to the ribbed panel, or, more reasonably, > that a compression crowned panel with 5 mm tall ribs (let's assume the same > width) rather than 20 mm tall ribs will have more load bearing capacity > because the ribs will contribute less negatively. Again, no one has ever suggested an unribbed panel in any capacity. READ THE POSTS. I can't explain anything at all to you if you invent implications instead of making an effort at understanding the basic mechanics. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC