Isn't it Note #19? On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joseph Garrett <joegarrett at earthlink.net>wrote: > JD wrote: "I'd normally find/design a core of somewhere in the .045" to > .043" > >for a winding of that overall diameter... > > It's the overall diameter that is wrong, not the core. To use a > #19.5 - #20.5 core at this point in the scale would be highly unusual > and besides even they would be overstressed." > > JD, > Say What?! Why is the use of a core wire of .043" on note number 24 be > "...unusual"? And, how do you figure it would be "overstressed" with that > winding size? I've run the numbers and find that to be well within safe > limits. Unless, of course, the string is excessively long. However, the > speaking length was not given, so I was merely extrapolating with a known > speaking length, of that note. One of us is missing something somewhere. > Joe > > BTW, pianotech overseer, where is the last post I sent? are we now, > CENSORING? Grrr! > > Joe Garrett, R.P.T. > Captain of the Tool Police > Squares R I > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20110714/6957ffcf/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC